I've noticed in this hobby, we have a tendency to expect perfection. I see it from all walks of collector - casuals to hardcore showers. Tiny flaws are nitpicked to death, returns are demanded when a model doesn't meet the standard set in one's head.
And I'm here to say - it's mostly bull.
There are of course, flaws that are genuinely returnable - broken pieces, noticeable scratches, big things essentially. Tiny things, less so. Poor dappling and shading are not returnable reasons, nor are flaws that are nearly indiscernible to the human eye or a camera lens. A good general rule of thumb is if you have to circle the flaw in the photo, it's probably not returnable.
But in most cases, you cannot and should not expect perfection from mass-produced factory models. It's an impossible goal! This doesn't just apply to Breyers - it's across the board, applicable to Stones, Schleich, CollectAs, WIAs. Even with customs and artist resins, you can't expect 100% perfection. Spend any amount of time talking with hobby artists or existing in the customizing and finishwork groups and you'll see they have to reach a point in prep work where it's good enough - perfection is not a reachable goal.
So then, what makes a model live show quality if every model is expected to have some level of flaws? Let me debunk it for you!
If you've been following the blog for a while, you may know my credentials from my judging clinics, but for those new here I'll list them again. My name is Macie and I've been collecting since 2008. My collection focuses on OF Breyer. I've been around horses in some capacity since roughly 2001. I was in 4-H for seven years, showed in IHSA in college, and was a working student at an eventing barn. I've photo shown model horses on and off since 2015, and have been live showing since 2022. I have had multiple overall champions in breed and collectability in both OF Breyer and OF Mini divisions. I started judging in a small capacity in 2022, and since fall 2024 I have judged at several shows, including Are You Kitten Me, the Happy Kamper Classic, the Big Orange Bash, and the River City Classic. I have also volunteered for NAN in 2022 and 2024, and did additional volunteer work for NAMHSA for BreyerFest 2025.
Find the information under the jump - keep in mind, as an OF collector, this will be written slanted in that direction. Customs and artist resins may be held to a different standard.
Glossary of Terms (LSQ, LSP, NAN-qualified, PSQ, etc):
The model horse hobby loves a good acronym, particularly when it comes to model horse showing. Before we break down what makes LSQ, first we need to define what LSQ is.
- LSQ: This stands for live show quality. LSQ is a subjective term meaning a horse is nice enough to show at a live model horse show. The horse will be relatively flaw-free. LSQ means different things to different people, and one person's LSQ may not be another's.
- LSP: This stands for live show proven. This horse has placed at a live show. Keep in mind, some shows are smaller than others - a horse can place at a live show and it may have been the only horse in the class.
- NAN: This stands for North American Nationals. NAN is the national qualifying championship organized by the North American Model Horse Show Association (NAMHSA). At NAN qualifying shows, the first and second placing horses earn NAN cards in either breed halter, non-breed halter, or workmanship. The card qualifies the horse to show at NAN.
- PSQ: This stands for photo show quality. This is a horse that may have flaws that cannot be seen in photos, or on the offside of the horse.
- OF: Stands for original finish. These models are unaltered, factory finish. OF models can have repairs so long as they are within factory finish - things like straightening a bent leg, touching up small rubs, or repairing broken limbs.
- CM: This stands for custom. Custom models are altered factory models - this can range from finish changes (frowned upon), complete repaint, repositioning legs, all the way up to completely resculpting the entire model. In extreme custom cases, you may not even be able to tell what the model started as.
- AR: Stands for artist resin. These are models that are sculpted and cast usually by independent artists out of resin. The blanks are then painted. These are not factory models.
Seams: Where is the Line?
A seam is the part of a model horse where two halves meet. Seams are inevitable in original finish model horses, particularly in the more mass-produced models, such as Breyers. There are some molds where the seam is common - like in Cosimo's mane above. On older factory-produced models, seams could be much worse. Some were so sharp you could cut yourself, others looked like they had been grinded down to the point of looking like tire tracks. I'd consider a model with sharper seams more of a flaw against the same model that has better sanded seams. But usually, all models from the same time period, or of the same mold will have similar looking seams. In this case, you can't count this as a flaw - if every model has it, it's part of the mold. Personally, I'd place the model with correct ABCs with a common visible seam over the model with no visible seam who is a conformational disaster.
| A seam split |
What is Stuck to Me?? Lint and Goobers:
| Even Stones aren't immune from factory flaws |
Finishwork Problems: Rubs, Pinpricks, and Overspray, Oh My!
| Some factory flaws do keep me from showing a model - my Hames has this mark in his plastic |
What's Wrong With My Legs? Tales of Extremity Woes:
Sometimes, model's legs are not always where they are supposed to be. Particularly with OF models, legs can get warped in transport, pegs from stands get broken off in feet, and things just get...wonky. It's always acceptable to lay a tippy model down on the table (though this does give the judge permission to pick it up to examine the other side). I sometimes do this with models that tend to be tippy even if they're stable, just because I'd rather be safe than sorry if a table gets bumped. As a judge, I don't hold this against the model.
That being said, some leg warping can be the deciding factor between two models. With the two foals in the photo above, I'd absolutely pin the foal with all four feet on the ground above the foal with one foot hovering above the air. That doesn't mean the foal on the left will never pin - there are absolutely judges who will forgive that foot for the sake of her being a more correct mold on the table, or a more collectible model. And as always, it comes down to what else is on the table.
There are problems with extremities that are major flaws, such as breaks and very obvious repairs. Horses with broken legs and ears are not LSQ. Horses with poorly repaired breaks will not show as well. That doesn't mean horses who have had breaks cannot show - with a top repair artist, models can be restored to LSQ. There is a line - the repairs should be indistinguishable from the original work.
The Butt Wrinkles Saga:
In 2019, Breyer released the Hamilton mold through their Premier Collection. Upon receiving their copies, some hobbyists noticed interesting lines on Hamilton's derriere. A few vocal hobbyists declared these "butt wrinkles" to be terrible gouges, and a major flaw. Except...they weren't. They were just how muscles move on a horse in the midst of a rack. Muscles on a sculpture behaving as they would on a real horse is not a flaw. Now, muscles not behaving as they would on a real horse is a problem, but it's not a flaw, and those horses could still have a place in a collectability class, or in a weaker breed class even.
In the Mind of the Judge:
So, we've looked into the various types of factory and aftermarket flaws you can find on a model horse. Now, as a judge, I'm here to explain why most of the time these flaws simply don't matter. To put it most bluntly - we simply do not have the time to go over every model in the class with a magnifying glass hunting for flaws. We do not want to be at the show hall until 10pm. Usually a judge has about 10 minutes to look at a class. Sometimes, OF Breyer classes can have upwards of 50 models in a class. Personally for me as a judge, I usually have my top contenders whittled down after my first pass of the table. For breed, it's a broad look - which sculpts present are viable both anatomically and as the breed they are assigned? For collectability, which models stand out as the most collectible (this is usually a much easier task in double-judged classes versus straight collectability classes). For workmanship, what horses stand out in the quality of the work done? Once the top contenders are selected, it's pretty quick to place them on a second or third pass. Usually for me, minor flaws do not even make it into my consideration when judging. It's something that is used as a nitpicky tie breaker if I'm stuck between two equally fantastic models.
| |
| No one has time to examine every horse closely in a class like this |
Minor flaws in original finish models are generally out of the control of the shower, so I'm more willing to give them a pass. Things that can be controlled, like breed assignments and dust are things I'm going to weigh more heavily than a flaw I know an entire run has. Think of the mane seams on the Fireheart and Cosimo molds - if the entire run has it, it's not a flaw. I'm less forgiving of these on customs and artists resins - sanding seams and fixing issues are an essential part of the prep work that goes into customizing.
Yaay! Thanks for this, hopefully it will set some of the flaw-circlers straight! 🤪 And I love the bit about the heinious butt-wrinkles! 😜. I've been showing since 1972, judging models since 1975, and real horses since the 80's. I spent 42 years breeding Arabians, and 20 years breeding mini horses, as well as being a mini-mare-midwife. I agree 💯 with this whole article!
ReplyDelete